Trust Board and Governance
In our Multi-Academy Trust (MAT), a single Trust is responsible for all of the member academies (15 academies as at March 2021).
The member academies and Chairs of Governors currently comprise:
Academy |
Chair of Governors |
Moseley Park & Heath Park | Dr Afua Adu Boateng |
Woden Primary | Laura Nicholls |
D’Eyncourt Primary | Carl Fox |
Coppice High School | Mark Taylor |
Westcroft & WVTC | Paul Bellamy |
Broadmeadow Special | Susan Ellick |
Eastwood, East Dene & Coleridge | Ray Griffiths MBE |
Vale of Evesham School | Jackie Summerfield-Constable |
Kingfisher School | Sam Gould |
Riversides School & Newbridge School | Dee Milbery |
The MAT consists of the Members and the Directors.
Members and Directors
There are 3 Members of CLPT, The Members are akin to the shareholders of a company. They have ultimate control over the academy Trust, with the ability to appoint some of the Directors and the right to amend the Trust’s Articles of Association. The Members are responsible for holding the Directors to account.
There are 7 Directors. Directors are responsible for the governance functions such as setting the direction of the trust, holding the CEO/headteachers to account and ensuring financial probity. As charity Directors, they also ensure that they are complying with charity law requirements. Academy Trusts are charitable companies and the Directors are company directors and must comply with company law requirements.
CLPT Directors sit on a Trust Board which requires them to regularly attend meetings, manage conflicts of interest, seek advice from the academies leadership teams and Executive Directors and ensure that the academies have appropriate procedures in place for reporting financial information. The Trust Board has delegated some of its decision-making to a Finance and Personnel Committee and an Audit and Risk Committee to assist in discharging its functions.
CLPT Articles of Association state that the Chair of the Board of Directors will also be a Member, thereby ensuring a link between the two layers.
(* These are also Directors who sit on the Trust Board)
Members |
Appointment Date |
Melvyn Pope | 28th October 2011 |
Robert Turton* | 13th March 2015 |
Phillip Marshall | 13th March 2015 |
Directors |
Graham Parker |
Robert Turton (Chair) |
Rachel Nash |
Sofia Zamir |
James Nichols |
Emma Woodhouse |
Jeremy Vanes |
Local Governing Bodies
CLPT has local governing bodies (LGBs) and Local Executive Governing Bodies (LEGB) and its membership are referred to as ‘governors’.
The details of what has been delegated from the Directors to local governors is detailed in a CLPT Scheme of Delegation. Even though some functions have been delegated to LGB’s, the Directors still remain accountable and responsible for these functions. (n.b. local governors are not Directors of the Academy Trust).
In Wolverhampton and Worcester there are individual LGBs and LEGBs. In Rotherham there is an Executive LGB which oversees the three primary schools.
Governance For New Schools Joining the Trust
Structural change, in any area of life, creates turbulence and the structural change of a school, from maintained to academy status, is no different. With this in mind, the Trust has moved to ensure that the implications for the governance of all schools undergoing conversion are minimised. There is however a difference, in our approach, between the process we adopt for converter and sponsor-led academies.
With the former, we do not make any changes to the composition of their governing body, other than adding two Trust nominees. It may well be that those nominees are already existing members of a particular governing body or they may be new additions.
For a sponsored-led academy, the Trust will add two nominees to the governing body and over a period of time reduce the number of governors to a minimum of nine voting members. This model will remain in place until the academy in question receives a “good or better” Ofsted judgement.
The Trust, in consultation with Governing Bodies, has articulated the Delegations for decision making so that there is clarity on responsibilities and who undertakes important tasks such as appointments, much in the same way as the LA has done previously.